← Blog

Building Pipelines, Not Filling Buckets

Brian Hunt
Brian Hunt
3 min read 5 sources
Listen

Early in my Air Force officer career, I watched a talented NCO spend every Monday morning manually compiling intelligence reports from a dozen different sources. He'd arrive early, pull the data, format everything in PowerPoint, and email it to leadership by 0600, so it's ready for the 0700 brief. Without fail. For three years.

When I asked why he didn't automate it, he said he'd tried once, but it didn't work perfectly, so he went back to the manual process. He was filling a bucket—solving the same problem every single week. What he needed was a pipeline.

The Bucket-Filling Trap

In cybersecurity and technology leadership, I see this pattern constantly. Smart people solving the same problems repeatedly, becoming indispensable in the process, then burning out or becoming bottlenecks. It feels productive—you're busy, you're needed, you're delivering results. But you're trapped in a cycle that doesn't scale.

Filling buckets looks like:

The irony? The better you get at filling buckets, the more buckets appear. You become a victim of your own competence.

What Pipeline-Building Actually Means

Building pipelines isn't about technology alone—it's a mindset shift. It means asking a different question when problems arise: How do we ensure this never needs my manual intervention again?

In my work leading cyber defense and resilience programs, pipeline-building has taken many forms:

At Deloitte, we didn't bill clients for doing the same work repeatedly—we built frameworks and methodologies that could be deployed across multiple engagements. That's pipeline thinking. The initial investment was higher, but the long-term value multiplied.

The Leadership Dimension

As you move into senior leadership, pipeline-building becomes even more critical. Your value isn't in being the best individual contributor—it's in multiplying the effectiveness of everyone around you.

When I transitioned from hands-on technical roles to executive positions, I had to fight the urge to jump in and solve problems myself. It was faster, I knew I'd do it right, and frankly, it felt good. But every time I filled that bucket, I robbed someone else of the opportunity to learn and I added another dependency on my personal bandwidth.

The leaders who scale build pipelines:

The Test of a Good Pipeline

Here's how I evaluate whether I've built a real pipeline or just a slightly more efficient bucket: What happens when I go on vacation?

If things fall apart, I've built dependencies, not infrastructure. If the team barely notices I'm gone, I've built something sustainable.

During my Reserve duty rotations, I'm away from my civilian role for extended periods. Early in my career, I'd return to chaos—backlogs, delayed decisions, escalated issues. It felt important, even necessary. Now, when I return, operations have continued smoothly. That's not because I'm less valuable—it's because I've invested in building systems that don't require my constant presence.

Start With One Bucket

You don't have to transform everything overnight. Start with one recurring problem. The report you generate monthly. The question people ask you repeatedly. The process only you know how to execute.

Document it. Automate what you can. Teach it to someone else. Turn your expertise into infrastructure.

The goal isn't to make yourself obsolete—it's to make yourself scalable. To create leverage. To build something that continues delivering value long after you've moved on to the next challenge.

Because anyone can solve a problem once. The real impact comes from creating systems that solve problems forever.

Brian's Readings

Books that shape my thinking on the topics above.

Comments

No comments yet.